June 05, 2019

Chairman Takano, Senator Tester Demand Secret Waitlists from VA

Press Contact

Jenni Geurink (202-225-9756)

Miguel R. Salazar

WASHINGTON, D.C. – The House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Chairman Mark Takano and Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs Ranking Member Jon Tester sent a letter yesterday to VA following a whistleblower claim alleging VA has secret waitlists for veterans seeking health care, as reported by the Washington Post. In their letter, Chairman Takano and Senator Tester expressed their shared concern about the allegations and demanded that VA provide a more thorough explanation regarding the two sets of waitlists by the end of the week.

The full text of the letter can be found below:

The Honorable Robert Wilkie

Secretary

Department of Veterans Affairs

810 Vermont Avenue, NW

Washington, DC 20420

Dear Mr. Secretary:

We are writing with serious concerns regarding veterans’ access to timely health care.

As you know, in 2014, media reports based on whistleblowers’ allegations revealed major problems with the amount of time veterans had to wait for health care appointments at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). These revelations of very lengthy wait times were eventually substantiated. Further, it was shown that some VA hospitals misrepresented the facts and consistently skewed data to hide the problem. Congress examined the situation, leading to legislation to address delays in health care.  While some veterans still face major obstacles in accessing timely care, VA as a whole has appeared to be making progress.

It was, therefore, surprising to see reports of new and serious allegations in the media this morning concerning hidden wait times for veterans.

The Washington Post described how a whistleblower inside VA has reports showing two sets of differing wait time numbers.[1] According to the article, figures from these reports “indicate the actual number of veterans waiting for VA healthcare could be much higher than the numbers VA makes publicly available.” The differences appear quite large with a monthly wait time average in the internal VA report roughly three times as large as that shown in VA data made public.

VA did not dispute the existence of two sets of differing reports detailing the wait time numbers. Instead, VA’s spokesperson assigned the discrepancy to the use of administrative versus clinical numbers. However, this response is, at best, confusing.

We, therefore, ask VA to provide – by the end of this week – a more thorough explanation for the existence of two sets of reports on wait time for veterans’ health care. In fulfilling this request, VA should provide the House and Senate Committees on Veterans’ Affairs with the reports described by the article and the appropriate VA officials should make themselves available for a briefing to the Committees.

Sincerely,

Mark Takano                                                                                      Jon Tester

Chairman                                                                                            Ranking Member

House Committee on Veterans’ Affairs                                             Senate Committee on Veterans’ Affairs

###